<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Lorraine Warren</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.doclorraine.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.doclorraine.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 15:17:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Decode: Digital Design Sensations, new patterns of behaviour? by Quilts, Pixels and the V &#38; A &#8211; Lorraine Warren</title>
		<link>http://www.doclorraine.com/uncategorized/decode-digital-design-sensations-new-patterns-of-behaviour/comment-page-1/#comment-234</link>
		<dc:creator>Quilts, Pixels and the V &#38; A &#8211; Lorraine Warren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 15:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doclorraine.com/uncategorized/decode-digital-design-sensations-new-patterns-of-behaviour/#comment-234</guid>
		<description>[...] the V &amp; A, my last visit taking in the Decode Digital Designs showcase, subject of a previous blogpost.&#160; In many ways, the ability to host both the traditional art of quilting and&#160; the leading [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the V &amp; A, my last visit taking in the Decode Digital Designs showcase, subject of a previous blogpost.&#160; In many ways, the ability to host both the traditional art of quilting and&#160; the leading [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Good company? by Lorraine</title>
		<link>http://www.doclorraine.com/uncategorized/good-company/comment-page-1/#comment-198</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorraine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 10:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doclorraine.com/uncategorized/good-company/#comment-198</guid>
		<description>She is the author of this book so it will be interesting to see how that unfolds</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She is the author of this book so it will be interesting to see how that unfolds</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Good company? by doctorcdf</title>
		<link>http://www.doclorraine.com/uncategorized/good-company/comment-page-1/#comment-197</link>
		<dc:creator>doctorcdf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 09:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doclorraine.com/uncategorized/good-company/#comment-197</guid>
		<description>Lenin wasn&#039;t exactly a progressive when it came to sexual liberation; he was personally prudish in many respects.  The Soviet feminist Alexandra Kollentai once said that sex should be as uncontroversial as drinking a glass of water.  If I recall correctly, Lenin&#039;s reply was, &quot;Maybe for her.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lenin wasn&#8217;t exactly a progressive when it came to sexual liberation; he was personally prudish in many respects.  The Soviet feminist Alexandra Kollentai once said that sex should be as uncontroversial as drinking a glass of water.  If I recall correctly, Lenin&#8217;s reply was, &#8220;Maybe for her.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Good company? by Lorraine</title>
		<link>http://www.doclorraine.com/uncategorized/good-company/comment-page-1/#comment-196</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorraine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 08:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doclorraine.com/uncategorized/good-company/#comment-196</guid>
		<description>yes, you&#039;re right it was the NEP Men.  More on this when I&#039;ve finished reading - not a fun time as you say - feminist perspective on the times an important part of the book too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes, you&#8217;re right it was the NEP Men.  More on this when I&#8217;ve finished reading &#8211; not a fun time as you say &#8211; feminist perspective on the times an important part of the book too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Good company? by doctorcdf</title>
		<link>http://www.doclorraine.com/uncategorized/good-company/comment-page-1/#comment-195</link>
		<dc:creator>doctorcdf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 08:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doclorraine.com/uncategorized/good-company/#comment-195</guid>
		<description>The early 1920&#039;s was the period of Lenin&#039;s &quot;New Economic Policy&quot; - the entrepreneurs presumably are the so-called &quot;NEP Men&quot;, who got shafted the moment that Stalin took over: they made money while they could.  Furthermore, Russia had just been through a shattering civil war and the First World War: everyone was on edge at that point, everyone had dagger&#039;s drawn.  Not a fun time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The early 1920&#8242;s was the period of Lenin&#8217;s &#8220;New Economic Policy&#8221; &#8211; the entrepreneurs presumably are the so-called &#8220;NEP Men&#8221;, who got shafted the moment that Stalin took over: they made money while they could.  Furthermore, Russia had just been through a shattering civil war and the First World War: everyone was on edge at that point, everyone had dagger&#8217;s drawn.  Not a fun time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Boomers Mix TV with Their PCs? No surprise to me! by Lorraine</title>
		<link>http://www.doclorraine.com/uncategorized/boomers-mix-tv-with-their-pcs-no-surprise-to-me/comment-page-1/#comment-145</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorraine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 16:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doclorraine.com/uncategorized/boomers-mix-tv-with-their-pcs-no-surprise-to-me/#comment-145</guid>
		<description>Absolutely! Don&#039;t get me started on floppy disks though :-)  Enjoying your blog btw</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely! Don&#8217;t get me started on floppy disks though <img src='http://www.doclorraine.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />   Enjoying your blog btw</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Boomers Mix TV with Their PCs? No surprise to me! by Barb McMillen</title>
		<link>http://www.doclorraine.com/uncategorized/boomers-mix-tv-with-their-pcs-no-surprise-to-me/comment-page-1/#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator>Barb McMillen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 12:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doclorraine.com/uncategorized/boomers-mix-tv-with-their-pcs-no-surprise-to-me/#comment-142</guid>
		<description>All I can say is Yay! You should see my streaming system here - itunes to radio, netflix to tv - and we grew up BEFORE there were manuals. Only that darned DOS book of commands. Remember virutal drives? Sidekick?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All I can say is Yay! You should see my streaming system here &#8211; itunes to radio, netflix to tv &#8211; and we grew up BEFORE there were manuals. Only that darned DOS book of commands. Remember virutal drives? Sidekick?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Identity and privacy in the digital age by Tim Greenhalgh</title>
		<link>http://www.doclorraine.com/uncategorized/identity-and-privacy-in-the-digital-age/comment-page-1/#comment-140</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Greenhalgh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 16:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doclorraine.com/uncategorized/identity-and-privacy-in-the-digital-age/#comment-140</guid>
		<description>Thanks Lorraine - this fits in some measure with the Safer Internet Day campaign, which Ian Douglas, head of digital production at Telegraph.co.uk has blogged about today (feb 9). He rightly argues that the parents need guidance on what constitutes safe engagement - the boundaries of privacy in another form - so they can teach their children how to be responsible online. You can read his thoughts here: http://bit.ly/cYF2yM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Lorraine &#8211; this fits in some measure with the Safer Internet Day campaign, which Ian Douglas, head of digital production at Telegraph.co.uk has blogged about today (feb 9). He rightly argues that the parents need guidance on what constitutes safe engagement &#8211; the boundaries of privacy in another form &#8211; so they can teach their children how to be responsible online. You can read his thoughts here: <a href="http://bit.ly/cYF2yM" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/cYF2yM</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Privacy, identity and status? by Identity and privacy in the digital age &#8211; Lorraine Warren</title>
		<link>http://www.doclorraine.com/uncategorized/privacy-identity-and-status/comment-page-1/#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator>Identity and privacy in the digital age &#8211; Lorraine Warren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 13:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doclorraine.com/uncategorized/privacy-identity-and-status/#comment-135</guid>
		<description>[...] There is a plethora of discussion on multiple identities from many disciplinary perspectives, not just the technical, and how identity manipulation may be carried out for many motives, good and bad.&#160; Taking twitter as an example, there are many instances of multiple account holding, often for quite valid reasons – the separation of business and personal identities makes obvious sense from the point of both business and personal reputation and privacy. This is an area that would benefit from further study, not just entrepreneurs, but as a broader issue for society, given the links between privacy and status I discussed in my last post. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There is a plethora of discussion on multiple identities from many disciplinary perspectives, not just the technical, and how identity manipulation may be carried out for many motives, good and bad.&#160; Taking twitter as an example, there are many instances of multiple account holding, often for quite valid reasons – the separation of business and personal identities makes obvious sense from the point of both business and personal reputation and privacy. This is an area that would benefit from further study, not just entrepreneurs, but as a broader issue for society, given the links between privacy and status I discussed in my last post. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About by Tony Watson</title>
		<link>http://www.doclorraine.com/about/comment-page-1/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Watson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 13:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doclorraine.com/?page_id=2#comment-110</guid>
		<description>What a brilliant production, Lorraine! Congratulations.

Tony</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a brilliant production, Lorraine! Congratulations.</p>
<p>Tony</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
